Rice Fluid Ounces to Grams
Snapshot
1 fluid ounce of rice equals 26.25 grams.
- Reference basis: 26.25 g per 1 US fluid ounce.
- Example: 2 fl oz = 52.5 g.
Interactive conversion
Converter Calculator
Decimals: 1.5 or 1,5. Fractions: 1/2. Scientific notation: 1e3. Write 1000 without grouping separators.
26.25 Grams
SwitchWith 1 fluid ounce of Rice, that equals 26.25 grams.
API and AI agent access
Rice Fluid Ounces to Grams. Material: rice.
Machine-readable identifiers
- Conversion family
cooking- Source unit
fluid_ounce_us- Target unit
gram- Ingredient
rice
Use these identifiers in the API request. Sources and model limits also apply to software clients.
Example API request and response
POST /api/v1/convertRequest
{
"family": "cooking",
"value": 1,
"from": "fluid_ounce_us",
"to": "gram",
"material": "rice"
}Essential response
{
"ok": true,
"conversion": {
"family": "cooking",
"value": 1,
"from": "fluid_ounce_us",
"to": "gram",
"result": {
"raw": 26.25,
"display": "26.25"
},
"canonicalPath": "/cooking/fluid-ounces-to-grams/rice/"
}
}Explanation
Calculation basis: grams per US cup divided by 8 US fluid ounces per cup.
Rice uses a recorded reference of 210 grams per US cup in this dataset. Confidence: low. Source basis: and1 ingredient weight chart: 1 cup rice = 210 g https://www.and1.com/measurements/cups-in-gram/
Evidence status: source-unverified. The cited AND1 source has not been independently verified. Its current domain context does not establish the original measurement. Particle size, aeration, settling, and whether the cup is scooped or spoon-filled can materially change the mass held by the same volume.
Common Conversion Values
| Fluid Ounces | Grams |
|---|---|
| 1/2 | 13.13 |
| 1 | 26.25 |
| 2 | 52.5 |
| 4 | 105 |
| 8 | 210 |
| 12 | 315 |
| 16 | 420 |
Questions & answers
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this based on an ingredient-specific density estimate?
Yes. The page reduces the same 210 g-per-cup basis to a per-fluid-ounce estimate for Rice.
Does grain shape or settling change the result for Rice?
Rice keeps one reference basis here, but grain shape and how the grains settle in the cup can shift practical density. That is why volume estimates for this ingredient should stay ingredient-specific.